Stefan Sperling wrote: > Alexey Neyman wrote: >> Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> I'd prefer keeping --no-diff-properties and add a --patch option >>> later which implies --no-diff-properties and maybe other options. >> >> I was explicitly asked by Julian Foad to avoid adding more >> low-level options (such as --no-diff-properties) and add >> "interface-level" options instead. I am fine with either approach.
Actually, my contribution to this design discussion was only to say that having a high-level option was "potentially a good direction to go [...]": <http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-11/0081.shtml>. > I'd prefer having both low-level and high-level options available. > > That way it is easier to tell what each individual option does. > Higher-level options can simply explain themselves as being > equivalent to some set of lower-level options. That sounds good to me. > But feel free to let us argue about it instead of getting involved > in the bikeshedding. We can apply your patch as-is and change the > option name later. It's no big deal. Before doing so I'll wait a bit > to see what the others have to say. Agreed. - Julian
