On Feb 14, 2012 8:54 AM, "Philip Martin" <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: > > Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes: > > > Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> writes: > > > >> Please explain again, why do we need the revved _ensure2 at all? Can you > >> think of any possible way that even marginally sane code would break if > >> we just fixed the docs and behaviour of _ensure? > > > > I was thinking the same. What would break is somebody reading the new > > docs and writing code that fails when linked against existing > > svn_stringbuf_ensure. > > A patch from trunk backported to an old branch, say.
That is entirely stretching. Please. Let's be rational here. Just fix the docstring. -g
