On 14.02.2012 14:53, Philip Martin wrote: > Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes: > >> Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> writes: >> >>> Please explain again, why do we need the revved _ensure2 at all? Can you >>> think of any possible way that even marginally sane code would break if >>> we just fixed the docs and behaviour of _ensure? >> I was thinking the same. What would break is somebody reading the new >> docs and writing code that fails when linked against existing >> svn_stringbuf_ensure. > A patch from trunk backported to an old branch, say. >
Well then, I propose in advance that we backport the svn_stringbuf_ensure patch. :) -- Brane
