On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Greg Hudson <ghud...@mit.edu> wrote:
> I also want to caution that PBKDF2 does not provide strong protection
> against offline dictionary attacks.  Most cryptographic methods provide
> exponential protection--I do a little bit more work to make you do twice
> as much work.  PBKDF2 provides only linear protection--I do twice as
> much work to make you do twice as much work.  It does not make
> dictionary attacks "impossible" in the same sense that AES-128 makes
> decryption without knowing the key "impossible".

Is it worth looking at scrypt[1] instead of PBKDF2?  -- justin

1. http://www.tarsnap.com/scrypt.html

Reply via email to