Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> writes: > Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 08:15:11 -0300: >> that, isn't the problem of disabling NLS, including >> svn_private_config.h and risking including something else which may use >> libintl.h independent of the kwallet code? > > Are you talking about order of includes --- a header included after > svn_private_config.h possibly redefining the '_' macro? Or are you > talking about link-time or run-time issues?
The former, which (as I understood) is the reason Arfrever gave for not removing the NLS checks altogether from kwallet.m4.
