On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name>wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:49:04 -0500: > > Instead, I propose subdirectories named ev2 in the various libsvn_foo > > directories which would hold Ev2 implementations. They would eventually > go > > Not objected to subdirs, but have you considered just naming your files > libsvn_repos/ev2_replay.c and so on? That doesn't need any build.conf > changes... > I thought about that, but didn't want to double the number of files in something like libsvn_client where there are several editor implementations. I know we already have subdirectories in at least a couple of places (mod_dav_svn comes to mind). Are the build.conf changes that invasive? > away if/when the Ev2 implementations replace the existing ones. We > haven't > > historically used subdirectories in this way, but I think this type of > > change would make implementation and maintenance easier. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -Hyrum >
