Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:11:50 -0500: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name>wrote: > > > Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:49:04 -0500: > > > Instead, I propose subdirectories named ev2 in the various libsvn_foo > > > directories which would hold Ev2 implementations. They would eventually > > go > > > > Not objected to subdirs, but have you considered just naming your files > > libsvn_repos/ev2_replay.c and so on? That doesn't need any build.conf > > changes... > > > > I thought about that, but didn't want to double the number of files in > something like libsvn_client where there are several editor implementations. > > I know we already have subdirectories in at least a couple of places > (mod_dav_svn comes to mind). Are the build.conf changes that invasive?
No, they aren't invasive; they're just one more moving part --- and I've spent the last couple of days reducing the number of moving parts (in various other contexts), so I quite appreciate the difference between "0. Profit!" and "0. Foo 1. Profit!". > > > away if/when the Ev2 implementations replace the existing ones. We > > haven't > > > historically used subdirectories in this way, but I think this type of > > > change would make implementation and maintenance easier. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -Hyrum > >