Greg Stein wrote: > Eh? So it already has a separate/different semantic?
No, it already had near-enough the same semantics: "allow property values that this client thinks are invalid". This just extends it to mean "allow property values *and names* that ...". - Julian > Yay. > Bert Huijben wrote: > In this case I think the answer is easier than in most similar > cases: We already support --force on propset in older Subversion > versions. >> >> Brane has done some excellent work here. But it seems nobody has >> asked the question: why --force instead of (say) --allow-propname ? >> >> Haven't we already decided that --force is horribly overloaded, and >> horribly undefined?
