On 03/14/2013 10:42 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 08:35 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> I think that issues #4329 and #4316 are the blocking ones. It will be
>> much better if we could fix these two issues before the branch.
> 
> I'm not trying to be contentious, but ... why before the branch?  I guess if
> we thought the solutions would require major overhaul, lots of code churn --
> in other words, that they'd be a pain to review and merge -- it would make
> sense to try to fix them before entering the Additional Process Zone.  But
> is that the case for these?

Spoke too soon.  I see elsethread that Julian does expect #4316 to be a bit
more churny and agrees that this should happen before branching.  I'm cool
with that -- he is, after all, much closer to the merge code than I am.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to