2013/7/3 Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.s...@gmail.com>:
> On 2013/7/3 6:55, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2013/7/3 Andreas Stieger <andreas.stie...@gmx.de>:
>>> Hi There,
>>>
>>> On 02/07/13 16:00, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>>>> Today, when I merge zh_CN.po from trunk to 1.8.x, I had encounter the
>>>> following error:
>>>>
>>>> $ python ../../../../trunk/tools/dev/po-merge.py <
>>>> ../../../../trunk/subversion/po/zh_CN.po zh_CN.po
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>> File "../../../../trunk/tools/dev/po-merge.py", line 196, in <module>
>>>> main(sys.argv)
>>>> File "../../../../trunk/tools/dev/po-merge.py", line 181, in main
>>>> for m in msgstr:
>>>> TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable
>>>>
>>>> Then I found in the line 39-40 of po-merge.py return None as msgstr:
>>>>
>>>> if line.strip() == '' or line[:2] == '#~':
>>>> return comments, None, None, None
>>>>
>>>> So we should not do iteration on msgstr without make sure msgstr is
>>>> not None.
>>>>
>>>> This happened because zh_CN.po have msgmerged po comments like this:
>>>>
>>>> #~ msgid "Uncommitted local addition, copy or move%s"
>>>> #~ msgstr "未提交的本地增加,复制或移动 %s"
>>>>
>>>> As your judgement, this is not "obvious fix", should I revert this
>>>> commit ?
>>> I cannot make sense of this change other than when malformed input files
>>> are concerned. Your example "^#~" requires msgstr == None == msgid as
>>> per the return of parse_translation(). That, then, means that comments
>>> evaluates to true (has entries) for the break in line 153 not to trigger.
>>>
>>> Can you give to input files (URl/revisions) that trigger this? So far
>>> this is my best guess:
>>>
>>> #SOMETHING
>>> #~ msgid "some msgid"
>>> #~ msgstr "some msgstr"
>>>
>>> I agree that msgstr == None should not be iterated, however I don't see
>>> how we get to this case.
>>>
>> Just noting:
>> The documentation string for "parse_translation(f)" function
>> explicitly documents what returned values can be None. The msgstr is
>> not one of them, it says "The msgstr is a list of strings.".
>>
>> But the actual implementation has one return statement that returns
>> None for that value.
>>
>> 39 arfrever 876651 > if line.strip() == '' or line[:2] == '#~':
>> 40 arfrever 874551 >   return comments, None, None, None
>>
>> If you are going on with r1498947 then I think it would be better to
>> update the docstring.
>>
>> Alternatively, returning an empty array instead of the last 'None'
>> should be an other way to fix this issue.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Konstantin Kolinko
> Yes, your noting looks more pretty, here is the patch:
>
> --- po-merge.py (revision 1499219)
> +++ po-merge.py (working copy)
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>      """Read a single translation entry from the file F and return a
>      tuple with the comments, msgid, msgid_plural and msgstr.  The comments is
>      returned as a list of lines which do not end in new-lines.  The msgid is
> -    string.  The msgid_plural is string or None.  The msgstr is a list of
> +    string or None. The msgid_plural is string or None.  The msgstr is a 
> list of

You fix the method to never return None here. Thus there is no need to
update the docstring.

>      strings.  The msgid, msgid_plural and msgstr strings can contain embedded
>      newlines"""
>      line = f.readline()
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>      comments = []
>      while True:
>          if line.strip() == '' or line[:2] == '#~':
> -            return comments, None, None, None
> +            return comments, None, None, []
>          elif line[0] == '#':
>              comments.append(line[:-1])
>          else:
> @@ -178,17 +178,16 @@
>                  for i in msgstr:
>                      outfile.write('msgstr[%s] %s\n' % (n, msgstr[n]))
>                      n += 1
> -        if msgstr is not None:
> -            for m in msgstr:
> -                if m == '""':
> -                    untranslated += 1
> +        for m in msgstr:
> +            if m == '""':
> +                untranslated += 1
>          for c in comments:
>              if c.startswith('#,') and 'fuzzy' in c.split(', '):
>                  fuzzy += 1
>
>      # We're done.  Tell the user what we did.
>      print(('%d strings updated. '
> -          '%d fuzzy strings. '
> +          '%d fuzzy strings. '

What is the change in the above line? I do not see any difference from
this diff.

>            '%d of %d strings are still untranslated (%.0f%%).' %
>            (update_count, fuzzy, untranslated, string_count,
>             100.0 * untranslated / string_count)))
>

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

Reply via email to