On 08/26/2014 09:02 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Personally, I'd be fine with renaming it. Others think > we shouldn't do it because of "released". Realistically, > we will break hardly anybody's setup by renaming it.
+1. > Note that we > never include such headers in current Subversion code except > "fs-loader.h" and tests. > > > Would moving the declarations (2 structs, 10 functions) > to a new "include/private/svn_fs_fs_private.h" be sufficient > in your opinion? I should think that would be sufficient. But then, it wasn't my opinion that you solicited. :-)
