SUMMARY: --------- +1 to release VERIFIED: --------- Other than some unimportant link/content differences[1] in
tools/dist/nominate.pl tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnpubsub tools/server-side/svnpubsub/rc.d/svnwcsub and the expected differences in subversion/include/svn_version.h, https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip is identical to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.9.x@1675149 [1] See http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-05/0079.shtml for details. Note: I calculated the SHA1 checksum of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip as c6a7e8187bc1051881010f01647313e9 which *differs* from the published value at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.sha1 >fciv --sha subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip // // File Checksum Integrity Verifier version 2.05. // c6a7e8187bc1051881010f01647313e9 subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip >svn cat https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.sha1 2443ccc26fd3280b24d38087c5f4291202787f1d As I mentioned above, I copied the zip contents over the top of a 1.9.x@1675149 checkout and didn't notice anything unexpected (though FWIW the link issue with tools/dist/nominate.pl is new since I last tested 1.8), so maybe an error on your end Ben? >gpg2 --verify subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip.asc gpg: WARNING: multiple signatures detected. Only the first will be checked. gpg: Signature made 04/21/15 15:55:40 Eastern Daylight Time using RSA key ID 16A0DE01 gpg: Good signature from "Ben Reser <[email protected]>" gpg: aka "Ben Reser <[email protected]>" gpg: aka "Ben Reser <[email protected]>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 19BB CAEF 7B19 B280 A0E2 175E 62D4 8FAD 16A0 DE01 TESTED: ------- [Release-Build] x[ fsfs | bdb ] x [ ra_file | ra_svn | ra_serf) ] RESULTS: -------- All Tests Pass PLATFORM: --------- MS Windows 7 Home Premium Service Pack 1 Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2012 Version 11.0.60315.01 Update 2 DEPENDENCIES: ------------- APR: 1.4.6 APR-UTIL: 1.4.1 zlib: 1.2.7 OpenSSL: 0.9.8q Apache: 2.2.22 BDB: 4.8.30 sqlite: 3.7.7.1 Python: 2.7.2 (ActivePython 2.7.2.5) Perl: 5.14.2 Ruby: ruby 1.8.7 java: 1.7.0_10 junit: 4.8.2 swig: 1.3.40 serf: 1.3.8 SIGNATURE: ---------- user: "Paul T. Burba <pburba_at_collab.net>" 4096-bit RSA key, ID 56F3D7BC, created 2012-12-11 For https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.9.0-rc1.zip: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJVS7MxAAoJEGTdwHFW89e8lVAP/0dD855aWpSa48u18WrnIWNI NbHhJWkgxJqqAKF6LZjlvN5g48z/NH02EvC5rPyca3Nfv0wTsR2ApWQ33BpV7jKj PJHQ0JPhUti0E29MsU2eKKgo2iH9H9RSIPM8MT6sVNTKmIC9WdyE2x3+F/YG0V1C snvMONJVcullz7N/mtWaFVBDyCxv4qne2S4khzBjYJrDoLwZm1pdZkfdvKTNz5fB 1HTXkFN8Wt3pgFkq5Uao0Ti6QkCK5CPyIljDMysTO+IY/iz9jsa9HN6TNiyd5kBT bCLt4Jz0BK8n6vZ7M2roH+2wb11dy3CuoOy7lbNpSRJcqUKs+YYRAbNIjPqoiTSl +Y2aQKQ2Ce6sSuqBfBLW/1iKyEhRRgamU6ve2xzOxXFtouMJ1fVyisuihpasZXUA 8tarhqdXnvGANp5YxIrnD4n4lTOzHPq1msd0uMpNFQ5C0D+OSze9MIuz/VTK036D Qa3OBiOzacR423L/KEi+oV9VoDexsv1Q4vr5STL4CDNBpSv3qSKSV2ACRu3NN9L2 n34I9SYw79vdf/YAPABrINcc7nbj8+2r3bzNVWQLI5dCNhLIHItNYF/584voqyMe l3WCnqnw+A6Y0HDjhk+yZfiMxw6DQxDKGVSlTpozbiGvVgtd+HFlLla2gvYLWC79 tli2xlL1u7wDPytZ5VXM =sqLd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Paul Burba <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Ben Reser <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 4/21/15 1:09 PM, Ben Reser wrote: >>> The 1.9.0-rc1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. >>> Please get the tarballs from >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion >>> and add your signatures there. >>> >>> This being a rc1 it means that our soak period for 1.9.0 has begun as >>> described >>> here: >>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-stabilization >> >> Still need one more Windows vote. Unlike a beta or alpha we need 3 +1's for >> both Windows and *nix. > > Hi Ben, > > Running the tests right now, just waiting for the ra_serf variants to > complete. No failures so far, so I should have sigs incoming by > tonight barring any unexpected failures. > >> If there are objections happy to roll a rc2 with whatever fixes needed. I >> know >> we've got several things queued up for a possible rc2. >> > > > > -- > Paul T. Burba > CollabNet, Inc. -- www.collab.net -- Enterprise Cloud Development > Skype: ptburba -- Paul T. Burba CollabNet, Inc. -- www.collab.net -- Enterprise Cloud Development Skype: ptburba
