On 6/27/2016 1:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com
<mailto:gst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Stefan <luke1...@posteo.de
<mailto:luke1...@posteo.de>> wrote:
>...
And now I also remember and realize that these removed symbols
were
actually private ones never intended to be exported (aka:
double _ in
the name).
To be clear: they WERE intended to be exported, so other svn libraries
could use them. We have hundreds of such functions.
Yeah I must have misremembered something here. I also didn't want to
suggest that this would violate the ABI compatibility (as you state they
were private symbols and therefore not covered by the ABI guarantee). I
just misremembered the reasoning why they were added and then removed
(guess I just remember some discussion related to the clean up of
symbols prior to the 1.7 or 1.8 release which is completely independent
from these symbols).
--
Regards,
Stefan Hett
