On 10.10.2019 23:12, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:54 PM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: >> Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 16:28:21 -0400: >>> If we have to pull that item out (not saying we do yet, just IF), then that >>> leaves us with no Python tasks. I'd like to have something Python-related >>> on the list because there's a good chance that a 700+ member university >>> hackathon will have some Python programmers. Any other suggested >>> Python tasks we could add? >> Something in the test harness. For example, make it easier to run «make >> check» >> with client version ≠ server version, to actually test on-the-wire >> compatibility. Or use trunk client and trunk server, but make them both >> expose >> fewer capabilities, to test that compatibility codepaths. > Has any work been done on making the test harness Py3 compatible? > If not, then perhaps a Py2 -> Py3 port is something that should be on the > list. Even if a 2 day hackathon is not enough time, even making a dent in > that will be a helpful thing.
The test harness (and other build-related stuff) has been compatible with Python3 for quite a few years now. -- Brane
