> On Mar 14, 2020, at 10:32 AM, James McCoy <james...@jamessan.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 03:26:48PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:12:41AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote: >>> My only advice would be to reach a point where we accept no one is going to >>> step up and fix this on Windows and then decide accordingly. If we can fix >>> it >>> for Linux without making Windows any worse, then I would think we should do >>> that. I do not see why we cannot leave the tests failing on Windows. Again, >>> as long as we have not made Windows any worse, if some future APR update >>> were >>> to make the tests pass that sounds like a good thing. >>> >>> As long as we know why the tests fail, that seems acceptable to me. If we >>> cannot fix Linux without making Windows worse than it is with 1.13 then that >>> is different and more complicated for sure. >> >> I cannot really judge the impact on Windows. Apparently, the change >> breaks things on Windows because APR's code doesn't work properly there. >> >> Let's wait a bit and see if developers involved will speak up. > > I'm working on it now. I should be able to have something that avoids > regressions on Windows this weekend.
Thank you! Mark
