On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:32:04AM -0400, James McCoy wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 03:26:48PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:12:41AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote: > > > My only advice would be to reach a point where we accept no one is going > > > to > > > step up and fix this on Windows and then decide accordingly. If we can > > > fix it > > > for Linux without making Windows any worse, then I would think we should > > > do > > > that. I do not see why we cannot leave the tests failing on Windows. > > > Again, > > > as long as we have not made Windows any worse, if some future APR update > > > were > > > to make the tests pass that sounds like a good thing. > > > > > > As long as we know why the tests fail, that seems acceptable to me. If we > > > cannot fix Linux without making Windows worse than it is with 1.13 then > > > that > > > is different and more complicated for sure. > > > > I cannot really judge the impact on Windows. Apparently, the change > > breaks things on Windows because APR's code doesn't work properly there. > > > > Let's wait a bit and see if developers involved will speak up. > > I'm working on it now. I should be able to have something that avoids > regressions on Windows this weekend.
Done in r1875230. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7 2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB
