Mark Phippard wrote: > [...] Or are you suggesting > the vote in STATUS essentially "counts" as the approval we need?
That, plus automating the mechanical parts, forms the essence of it. These two things (the current double voting (once to apply the patch and again to release it) and the non-automated automatable process) seem to be the two main burdens we could reduce. +1 to your point about not making releases that just contain a trivial patch, so we do want some batching. How to combine "some batching" with the above, I wonder? - Julian
