Evgeny Kotkov via dev wrote on Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:52 +00:00: > I can complete the work on this branch and bring it to a production-ready > state, assuming there are no objections.
Your assumption is counterfactual: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/202301.mbox/%3C20230119152001.GA27446%40tarpaulin.shahaf.local2%3E https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/202212.mbox/%3CCAMHy98NqYBLZaTL5-FAbf24RR6bagPN1npC5gsZenewZb0-EuQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E Objections have been raised, been left unanswered, and now implementation work has commenced following the original design. That's not acceptable. I'm vetoing the change until a non-rubber-stamp design discussion has been completed on the public dev@ list. Daniel
