This discussion has become too silly even for the ministry of silly mailing list discussions.
uriel On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Anselm R Garbe<garb...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/9/8 Uriel <lost.gob...@gmail.com>: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Anselm R Garbe<garb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> So you judge about things you believe you have superior clue about, >>> then go ahead and do us a favor and build a decent web browser that we >>> can all be happy with. >> >> Blah, blah, blah, irrelevant nonsequitour. >> >>> As I said very often to you: talking and discrediting things is >>> *simple*, but getting things done isn't. >> >> It might be 'simple', but still it has to be done, and nobody does it, >> everyone is too busy kissing each others asshole, so I do it, and if >> people get pissed and whinny at me for it, that is their problem. >> >> And you are the one here talking unjustified shit about Chrome when >> comparing it to clearly inferior designs, not me, you lost the >> technical argument, so now bring the stupid moralizing bullshit. > > You should read again what I wrote, I didn't compare Chrome to actual > inferior designs, I compared it with a theoretical thin layer and the > pattern I'm using is: less code -> less bugs, less code -> higher > likelihood of better security, less code -> higher likelihood and > better performance. Also note that this pattern is not an absolutism > (as your judgements seem to be). > > If you disagree with this, let me know. > >> And if I wanted to rub salt into your wounds I could add that if it >> was not for my judgement you would still be programming in C++, using >> auto*hell, praising Object Oriented programming as the greatest >> invention in the history of programming, and god only knows what else. > > That true, but it's also true that it was me that came up with dwm > after a while when you where still insisting to keep wmii going and > that a WM should have a 9P interface, editable tagbars and what not. > To put some pepper into these wounds, let's have some charts: > > http://code.suckless.org/stats/dwm-sloc.png (now) > http://code.suckless.org/stats/wmii-3.6-sloc.png (when I stopped with wmii) > http://code.suckless.org/stats/wmii-sloc.png (now) > > SLOC of wmi-10 (for the record): > > SLOC Directory SLOC-by-Language (Sorted) > 12952 src_top_dir cpp=12952 > 459 top_dir sh=459 > 28 examples sh=28 > 0 man (none) > > Kind regards, > Anselm > >