On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:29:29PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:25:04 -0400 > Jacob Todd <jaketodd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:47:07PM +0400, anonymous wrote: > > > Do we really need that "What Works" list on > > > http://surf.suckless.org/? It tells reader what sites works with > > > WebKit? > > > > > Some sites do silly things with cookies, and they don't work, or > > don't work too well with surf. I think it's somewhat usefull. > > > > then maybe it's better to list what *doesn't* work, with a short note > why.
Yes, it really does NOT make sense to list all sites that DO work well. This list would be ether far from being complete or close to infinite. - yoshi