On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:29:29 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck <die...@plaetinck.be> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:25:04 -0400 > Jacob Todd <jaketodd...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:47:07PM +0400, anonymous wrote: >> > Do we really need that "What Works" list on >> > http://surf.suckless.org/? It tells reader what sites works with >> > WebKit? >> > >> Some sites do silly things with cookies, and they don't work, or >> don't work too well with surf. I think it's somewhat usefull. >> > > then maybe it's better to list what *doesn't* work, with a short note > why. > > Dieter
What Works list would be nice ... and better if someone who knows C better than me could write a patch to surf so when site (hopefully not every forum of hobbies) works, you could just hit hotkey and it submits url (FE http://underdomain.this-site-doesnt-suck.much/ not whole url ofcourse) to the list. - Erno
