On 26 November 2010 15:33, Christophe-Marie Duquesne <chm.duque...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The threaded input is neat, and I am perfectly willing to > > add it into dmenu proper. Though I expect others will not share that > > willingness. > > It isn't. I experimented a crash when messing with it, so expect to find bugs.
I meant 'neat' in the sense of 'cool'... If we were to integrate it we would definitely do a thorough debugging beforehand. Though it does occur to me that we may need to use locking. Which ... suddenly makes the whole idea look a lot less quick and easy. On 26 November 2010 15:36, Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: > works instantaneously for me. I see some 2s lack if I increase to seq > 1000000 | dmenu though. > But is 1M items a usual scenario? I kind of doubt that and the 2s > penalty doesn't sound too bad imho. Yeah, that seems pretty fast, though obviously seq is a very fast process: my second response was a stronger argument. But having remembered locking, I'm a lot less eager to do this. >.> cls
