> Security isn't kept. This seems like more of a prevention of accidental > disclosure than real security. (And therefore pointless...?) > As an example, with this patch applied, run the following: > The output in the spy terminal is: > _SURF_GO: not found > _SURF_GO(UTF8_STRING) = 0x61, 0x73, 0x64, 0x66 == "asdf" > _SURF_GO: not found
You're absolutely right, thanks for noticing that flaw in my patch. Do you have any idea if it is possible to set up some write-only atom in X11 or we would need something else like unix socket, to prevent some other party spying what URLs are sent to *surf*? Cheers, -- Adam Strzelecki
