On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:19:00 +0100 Connor Lane Smith <c...@lubutu.com> wrote:
> On 20 May 2011 14:54, Kurt H Maier <karmaf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't understand why. If you want stderr to be combined into > > stdout, suffix 2>&1 to your command. By default, I think different > > filehandles should land in different outputs. > > I just think the stdout and stderr ought to be visible at the same > time. Or perhaps it would suffice to show stderr above stdout, or > automatically switch, or something. this could be configurable by the user. or at least changeable at runtime.
