Markdown is the only decent option for documentation. A part from a .docx On 31/10/2011, at 15:57, "Bjartur Thorlacius" <svartma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:34:10 -0000, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: >> Martin Kopta wrote: >>> Proposal: 6. It has useful documentation. >> >> Now bureaucracy begins. What documentation? A manpage should suffice, >> when it reaches 1.0. I think it's already sucking, if a project really >> needs a webbrowser to be opened for the documentation. >> > There's nothing wrong with HTML documentation per se, and it sure is not > worse than ASCII. Why do you believe roff is better than HTML? Just pipe the > markup through htmlfmt(1) or html2text(1) if you like reading documentation > on terminal emulators. And as long as the markup > is terse, reading marked up text is perfectly acceptable. >
