Connor Lane Smith <c...@lubutu.com> writes: > On 31 October 2011 12:27, Krnk Ktz <krnk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What should be done about ii? Are there features requests? I mean, it is a >> great concept and works very well as it is, doesn't it? > > It works well, but the source could do with a little cleaning up. > There are some weird things, like fprintf(stderr, "%s", ...), no > forward declarations, very few comments, for some reason it doesn't > use stdio so has no buffering, etc.
I also think that it has some slight bugs with robustness (it should attempt to reconnect if disconnected), but it is otherwise a very good program, and I would be sad to see it go. -- \ Troels /\ Henriksen