On July 15, 2014 11:20:44 AM EEST, Rafa Garcia Gallego <rafael.garcia.gall...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >With Dimitris' recent vi(m) bindings came a bug. > >BUG: operations added via multiplication appear as a set of unchained >single Undo(s). They should be chained so they are undone / redone >together. I've not looked at the undo code (seemed a bit scary when I scrolled pass it), but can't we use the GroupUndo flag? Not sure at all though, I'll check the code in a moment.
>Which made me realize: > >TODO: need to extend the repeat framework (i.e. the '.' command) to >store operations, multiplication and their parameters. >TODO: may need a replace implementation if we want to repeat commands >like 'c2w' properly. We could use that to implement the 'R' mode too. I think that we also want a cut implementation, instead of delete, as it will serve the exact same purpose and cut will be used a lot. I'll check to see how expensive is clip management (if at all) and I'll implement it, if you agree.
