On 26 February 2016 at 17:11, Greg Reagle <greg.rea...@umbc.edu> wrote: > On 02/26/2016 11:29 AM, Raphaël Proust wrote: > I got it to work for me: > […]
You are right, this change seems to work. I managed to reconstruct an example that I am dissatisfied about. The following works: Edit ,x/test/{ i/< a/> } But not the following: Edit ,x/test/{ a/> i/< } The second one you the result "<tes>t" and a warning about changes being out of sequence. Obviously, this particular case is rather simple, but sometimes it makes it hard to write transformations. Basically, there is only one grouping operator (“do all those things sort of independently but the order better be right”) and no alternative grouping (e.g., “do all those transformations in this specific order”) which would sometimes make more sense. Ciao, -- ______________ Raphaël Proust