On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:34:37AM +0000, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> I managed to reconstruct an example that I am dissatisfied about.
> The following works:
> Edit ,x/test/{
> i/<
> a/>
> }
> But not the following:
> Edit ,x/test/{
> a/>
> i/<
> }
> The second one you the result "<tes>t" and a warning about changes
> being out of sequence.I get these results: The first version works fine. The second version shows error "?changes not in sequence" and does nothing. But I don't see a big problem here, only a minor inconvenience. Do your insert before your append when using a braced compound command, and it works fine.
