On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:31:53PM +0200, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote: > I just compile without xinerama, and dwm is slighty lighter than jwm. > If you stick to the minimum with jwm, it is not that heavy at all. This is > nice. > > Why jwm, because after chopping some lines into code, it can give a > nice minimalist fork.
Sure. I am not saying JWM is bad. Compared to, say, Gnome, I am sure JWM is fantastic. However, this conversation is not about comparing JWM to the worst-case scenario. This conversation is about you nominating JWM for a mention on the suckless website. Problems with the conversation so far: 1. You nominated JWM for inclusion on the suckless website without giving good reasons why. 2. You have now switched to a different topic about forking JWM, again without giving good reasons why. In return: 1. It has been explained to you why JWM should not be considered suckless software, but you have not acknowledged this explanation. 2. It appears that EvilWM obviates the need for forking JWM, but you have not acknowledged the suggestion of using EvilWM. 3. Someone has already called you out for being a troll. I was willing to extend a more charitable assessment, but you have failed to acknowledge their concerns and you have failed to correct your behaviour. Please aspire to a more focused style of discussion in which you actually engage with people. ~ Tim
