??? clang/llvm is a c++ abomination: a massive pile of c++ cr*p. If you dislike the GNU make, wait to read the c++ code of cmake, the build system of clang/llvm, not to mention ninja (something in the horrible python3 or python2). I am into llvm code right now, and I feel like working in an asylum: getting in the heads of sick minds, and I _really_ mean it. Your are aiming at replacing gcc (which is in the process of becoming of pile of steaming c++ cr*p), by an actual steaming pile of it! The _only_ benefit is to clean up the linux build system in order to ease the addition of alternative toolchains. Actually, it's even worse than not being suckless: I don't want open source software to be locked down by organized sickos who obfuscated critical code thanks to a language with a super complex and rich syntax. *Anything* c++ is _not_ suckless, actually light years away from it. Come to your senses, open your eyes!
On 12/25/18, Sean MacLennan <se...@seanm.ca> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 12:31:50 -0600 > Cág <c...@bitmessage.ch> wrote: > >> Wrong. Not even you can compile it with Clang, (HOSTCC=clang >> CC=clang), but link it with lld: >> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109288.html > > Sorry, I should have said you can't compile a *working* kernel with > clang. They are close though, and I believe they will do it. > > Cheers, > Sean > >