On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:42:51 -0500 Chibby Bromanson <chibby.broman...@eightbitmonster.com> wrote:
Dear Dorian, > I am very impressed with the suckless software movement and I am doing > my best to try to create my own tool that follows the philosophy. I > still have a lot to learn with the C language but so far I am proud of > the results. I would be greatful if someone would review my tool and > consider it for inclusion in the list of tools that ROCK! :D > > The tool is for maintaining a list of descriptive tags on an extended > file attribute. It plugs in nicely with fzf and other command line > tools. > > http://github.com/bromanbro/taggins > > Thank you for your consideration. thanks for reaching out! I am not a fan of xattrs, but they have their place in the world and are a good vehicle for tagged file systems. This space is not explored deeply enough, and some of my customers regularly ask me if I know of a tagged fs solution that is easy to use for non-technical people. Regarding the code itself: As Hadrien already mentioned, autohell is way overkill for what you're doing. In general, given xattrs are non-portable, I would use a construct like #ifdef __linux__ #include <sys/xattr.h> #else #error "system not supported" #endif and possibly create a "translation" layer of some sorts in a separate compilation unit tag.c which handles all the unportable stuff. tag.h would specify "general" functions (whose interfaces themselves are POSIX compliant) like int tag_add(...) int tag_remove(...) bool tag_is_set(..) and all the ugly details would be "hidden" in tag.c, where you could have a rough structure like #ifdef __linux__ #include <sys/xattr.h> #else #error "system not supported" #endif int tag_add(...) { ... #ifdef __linux__ ... #else #error "system not supported" #endif ... } If you, some day, decide to add extattr_ support (used in FreeBSD), you simply add another case in the ifdef, but you won't need to change any code outside of tag.c. As a crazy idea, you could also include a fallback in the else-case where you create a dot-metafile in the directory to store the attributes, but that's another matter. Given the program's simplicity I wouldn't use separate src- and man-folders, but that's a matter of taste. I'd nuke AUTHORS (that's what LICENSE is for), COPYING (you already have LICENSE), ChangeLog (put this stuff in README), Makefile.am, Makefile.in, NEWS (no one cares), README.md (I'd just use README and use markdown in there), compile, config.h.in, configure, configure.ac, depcomp, install-sh, missing (for obvious reasons. Your tool can be compiled with a 5-line-Makefile. If you don't know how, let me know and I'll help you out). With best regards Laslo Hunhold