+1 binding
> On Nov 28, 2023, at 2:50 PM, Ville Brofeldt <ville.v.brofe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > +1 (binding) > >> On Nov 28, 2023, at 12:09 PM, John Bodley <john.bod...@airbnb.com.INVALID> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Having launched a formal discussion thread for [SIP-99] Proposal for >> correctly handling business logic >> <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/25048> a few weeks ago [1], and >> having not received any major feedback, I thought it would be prudent to >> now put the SIP to a vote. >> >> As a reminder the SIP covers a slew of subtopics which are broken down into >> sub-SIPs, i.e., SIP-99 merely serves as an umbrella, whereas >> >> - [SIP-99A] Primer on managing SQLAlchemy sessions >> <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/25107> >> >> is merely a primer (to help set context), and >> >> - [SIP-99B] Proposal for (re)defining a “unit of work” >> <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/25108> >> - [SIP-99C] Proposal for model and business validation >> <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/25828> >> - [SIP-99D] Proposal for consolidating Command/DAO create, update, and >> upsert operations <https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/25830> >> >> outline the actual proposed changes. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number >> of votes are reached. Please vote accordingly: >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> >> If this warrants further discussion, we can leave the vote open longer to >> accommodate. >> >> Thanks >> -John >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/5y42olok00xtdbpw8pzq4hbrlmr57p79 >
