Dims
- there should not be stale copies
- people who work on them should work where they want to.
+1 to both!
Right now it's Asankha and co. So we should just make Status Quo permanent. It can be under Axis2 as a maven module or under WS-Commons or maven module under synapse. I really don't care, as long as people who maintain it make the decision
and do it in one spot.
I'd like to maintain these under Synapse.. We wrote these transports primarily for use by Synapse, and now we have JMS, NIO-HTTP/S, Mail, VFS (File), FIX and AMQP already.. These belong to a separate Maven module thats published to the Apache snapshots and Maven Central repos, and this JAR does not depend on the Synapse codebase at all. Anyone who wishes to use these can do so without any problems whatsoever, and raise JIRA's for bugs/enhancements where the code is actually maintained.

Glen
| | -1 from me to move them to Synapse.
The transports JMS, NIO-HTTP/S and others are already [developed and maintained] within Synapse..
| | These transports (JMS, NIO, whatever) are going to be generally useful to any Axis2 user, so why make them go look in Synapse's codebase for them?
I agree,.. however these transports were written by the Synapse community for primary use by them. So instead of asking them to maintain the code they write somewhere else - for the convenience of the secondary users, why not clearly document the available options under Axis2 and where one could download these extension transports developed by the Synapse community?

asankha

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to