[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12865542#action_12865542
]
Supun Kamburugamuva commented on SYNAPSE-593:
---------------------------------------------
How about if we think of the semantics as following.
In Synapse at the moment we have defined the request receiving points and
response receiving points.
In case of main sequence, both request receiving and response receiving points
are same (main sequence). So we have pre-defined the receiving point.
In case of proxy services, request is received by inSequence and response is
received by outSequence. Both are pre-defined receiving points.
We can take both main sequence and proxy services response receiving points as
pre-defined, default places.
So my point is, specifying the receiving sequence overrides these pre-defined
default receiving sequences. Having a receiving sequence is totally optional.
So user has to use it only in complex scenarios.
> Specifying a receiving sequence for sent messages
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SYNAPSE-593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-593
> Project: Synapse
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Supun Kamburugamuva
> Assignee: Supun Kamburugamuva
> Attachments: synapse_service_chaining.patch
>
>
> If a receiving sequence is specified for send mediator, the response can be
> directed to this sequence. This way we can achieve service chaining with
> normal non-blocking transport calls.
> I'm attaching a patch that introduce this feature. Please have a look and
> provide your feed back.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
