[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12865612#action_12865612
]
Supun Kamburugamuva commented on SYNAPSE-593:
---------------------------------------------
This outSequence foo is defined by the user and user decides, for some messages
coming in to the inSequence he/she don't want to invoke the outSequence and
wants to execute another sequence. So this configuration is totally up to the
user. This is exactly why I said this configuration creates a powerful language
rather than complicating it.
I'm not saying this patch is ideal for anything :). There may be better
solutions. But right now I see this as a good solution. That is why I wanted to
push this. Anyway I'm 100% open to any new ideas.
> Specifying a receiving sequence for sent messages
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SYNAPSE-593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-593
> Project: Synapse
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Supun Kamburugamuva
> Assignee: Supun Kamburugamuva
> Attachments: synapse_service_chaining.patch
>
>
> If a receiving sequence is specified for send mediator, the response can be
> directed to this sequence. This way we can achieve service chaining with
> normal non-blocking transport calls.
> I'm attaching a patch that introduce this feature. Please have a look and
> provide your feed back.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
