Personally, I have used both Continuum and Hudson, and I think Hudson is much better than Continuum. BTW, as you can see, there are only a couple of projects left that still use Continuum at Apache. All other projects are using Hudson. At work, we also migrated from Continuum to Hudson several months ago, and we are very happy with it. It's really the first time that I hear somebody suggesting to move from Hudson to Continuum.
Andreas On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 00:26, Hiranya Jayathilaka <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > How do you feel about switching to Continuum from Hudson as our CI > solution? I've been looking at the build notifications sent by > Continuum in the HttpComponents mailing list and they are very clean, > easy to comprehend and full of useful details. The Continuum > interface/dashboard also looks very good. For an example have a look > at [1]. WDYT? > > Thanks, > Hiranya > > [1] - > http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=1544&projectId=66 > > -- > Hiranya Jayathilaka > Senior Software Engineer; > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org > E-mail: [email protected]; Mobile: +94 77 633 3491 > Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
