On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 07:31 +0530, Hiranya Jayathilaka wrote: > Thanks for your input. My concern is that Hudson reports/notifications > sometimes are completely useless. Also recently there have been so > many false negatives reported on the list. I was hoping that may be > Continuum doesn't suffer these limitations. > > Thanks, > Hiranya > >
We at HttpComponents use both Continuum and Hudson, though, I personally find Hudson to be easier to manager and generally better. Both systems tend to produce false positives when running low on resources or are under heavy load. However in most cases the failures manifested themselves as various timeouts (connect / response timeouts) rather any particular flaw in the CI system. The main source of trouble with Hudson for me were frequent failures with deploying snapshots to the repository.apache.org, which, as Andreas pointed out, has nothing to do with Hudson as such. Cheers Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
