Hi Shafreen, I have merged the PR.
Thanks. On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 9:23 PM Shafreen <anfar.shafr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Build has passed for this PR. Please do have a look when you all get some > free time. > > On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 7:51 PM Shafreen <anfar.shafr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:19 PM shafreen anfar <anfar.shafr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ravi Undupitiya < >>> ravi.undupit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> It makes sense to do this. The idea of the fault sequence is for it to >>>> be used as an exception handling sequence, so OUT_ONLY should not change >>>> this. >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, will send a PR fixing this. >>> >> >> The below PR has the fix for the discussed issue. >> >> https://github.com/apache/synapse/pull/45 >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 1:08 pm, shafreen anfar < >>>> anfar.shafr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> At the moment, when there is a failure in Message Processor (i.e. >>>>> Connection refused) fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario. >>>>> IMO, we should invoke fault sequence even in OUT_ONLY scenario. What do >>>>> you all think ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Shafreen >>>>> >>>> -- *Isuru Udana* Associate Director/Architect *; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com>email: isud...@gmail.com <isud...@gmail.com> *
