Hi, On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:49 AM Isuru Udana <isud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Shafreen, > > I have merged the PR. > Thanks Isuru! > > Thanks. > > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 9:23 PM Shafreen <anfar.shafr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Build has passed for this PR. Please do have a look when you all get some >> free time. >> >> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 7:51 PM Shafreen <anfar.shafr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 8:19 PM shafreen anfar <anfar.shafr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:28 PM Ravi Undupitiya < >>>> ravi.undupit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It makes sense to do this. The idea of the fault sequence is for it to >>>>> be used as an exception handling sequence, so OUT_ONLY should not change >>>>> this. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, will send a PR fixing this. >>>> >>> >>> The below PR has the fix for the discussed issue. >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/synapse/pull/45 >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 at 1:08 pm, shafreen anfar < >>>>> anfar.shafr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>> At the moment, when there is a failure in Message Processor (i.e. >>>>>> Connection refused) fault sequence is not invoked in OUT_ONLY scenario. >>>>>> IMO, we should invoke fault sequence even in OUT_ONLY scenario. What do >>>>>> you all think ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Shafreen >>>>>> >>>>> > > -- > *Isuru Udana* > Associate Director/Architect > > > > *; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com>email: isud...@gmail.com > <isud...@gmail.com> * > > >
