Hi JB, I mean just maven module, sure :) What do you prefer as a name? a) itests b) systests
Cheers, Andrei. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2012 20:47 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Extract syncope system/integration tests into separate project > > Hi Andrei, > > by separate project, you mean a "real" project (with its own release cycle, > artifacts, svn repo, etc), or just a Maven module ? > > I don't think it's a good idea to have it in a separate "real" project as it's > coupled to the others artifacts/modules/codebase. > > But a itest Maven module it's a good think (it's what we have most of > projects, like Karaf, ServiceMix, etc). > > Regards > JB > > On 12/09/2012 07:37 PM, Andrei Shakirin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would suggest to extract integration and system tests into separate > project. From my perspective it makes management of tests and build > process more transparent and easy. Of course, JUnit tests will stay in > corresponded projects. > > > > Does it make sense? > > > > Cheers, > > Andrei. > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
