Hi Fabio, After some clarifications about sync and provisioning process in Syncope, I agree with you it's a good improvement.
Regards, Denis > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: ernst Developer [mailto:[email protected]] > Inviato: lunedì 17 dicembre 2012 13:31 > A: [email protected] > Oggetto: Re: Schema Mapping improvement > > > Yes, I agree. > > > 2012/12/17 Fabio Martelli <[email protected]> > > > > > Il giorno 15/dic/2012, alle ore 13.16, ernst Developer ha scritto: > > > > > Hi Fabio, > > > > > > This seems a very good idea. > > > You could also consider a complete new mapping tab page > on which we could > > > do the sync mapping. In that case the current mapping is used for > > > propagation. > > > > Hi Ernst, > > yes, this is an alternative but I'd prefer to have all the > mappings about > > the same resource into a single tab. > > I think that, in this way, mapping configuration would be > simple and easy > > to manage (in terms of troubleshooting). > > Don't you agree? > > > > Regards, > > F. > > > > > Regards, > > > Ernst > > > > > > > > > 2012/12/14 Denis Signoretto <[email protected]> > > > > > >> > > >> Another way to get the same result couldn't be > > >> creating a specialization between sync and provisioned resources? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Denis > > >> > > >>> -----Messaggio originale----- > > >>> Da: Fabio Martelli [mailto:[email protected]] > > >>> Inviato: venerdì 14 dicembre 2012 16:55 > > >>> A: [email protected] > > >>> Oggetto: Schema Mapping improvement > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Hi guys, > > >>> since I see a strong limitation about the schema mapping > > >>> configuration I'd like to discuss with you about an improvement. > > >>> > > >>> From my PPOV Syncope should give the possibility to specify > > >>> two different mappings for synchronization and propagation. > > >>> > > >>> My suggestion is to provide two boolean flags: the former to > > >>> specify a propagation mapping and the latter to specify a > > >>> synchronization mapping. > > >>> Of course, each mapping must have a flag to true at least. > > >>> > > >>> WDYT? > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> F. > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
