Thank you guys, this is the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-257.
Kind regards, F. Il giorno 18/dic/2012, alle ore 09.40, Denis Signoretto ha scritto: > Hi Fabio, > > After some clarifications about sync and provisioning process in Syncope, > I agree with you it's a good improvement. > > Regards, > Denis > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: ernst Developer [mailto:ernst.develo...@gmail.com] >> Inviato: lunedì 17 dicembre 2012 13:31 >> A: dev@syncope.apache.org >> Oggetto: Re: Schema Mapping improvement >> >> >> Yes, I agree. >> >> >> 2012/12/17 Fabio Martelli <fabio.marte...@gmail.com> >> >>> >>> Il giorno 15/dic/2012, alle ore 13.16, ernst Developer ha scritto: >>> >>>> Hi Fabio, >>>> >>>> This seems a very good idea. >>>> You could also consider a complete new mapping tab page >> on which we could >>>> do the sync mapping. In that case the current mapping is used for >>>> propagation. >>> >>> Hi Ernst, >>> yes, this is an alternative but I'd prefer to have all the >> mappings about >>> the same resource into a single tab. >>> I think that, in this way, mapping configuration would be >> simple and easy >>> to manage (in terms of troubleshooting). >>> Don't you agree? >>> >>> Regards, >>> F. >>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ernst >>>> >>>> >>>> 2012/12/14 Denis Signoretto <denis.signore...@intesys.it> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Another way to get the same result couldn't be >>>>> creating a specialization between sync and provisioned resources? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Denis >>>>> >>>>>> -----Messaggio originale----- >>>>>> Da: Fabio Martelli [mailto:fabio.marte...@gmail.com] >>>>>> Inviato: venerdì 14 dicembre 2012 16:55 >>>>>> A: dev@syncope.apache.org >>>>>> Oggetto: Schema Mapping improvement >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>> since I see a strong limitation about the schema mapping >>>>>> configuration I'd like to discuss with you about an improvement. >>>>>> >>>>>> From my PPOV Syncope should give the possibility to specify >>>>>> two different mappings for synchronization and propagation. >>>>>> >>>>>> My suggestion is to provide two boolean flags: the former to >>>>>> specify a propagation mapping and the latter to specify a >>>>>> synchronization mapping. >>>>>> Of course, each mapping must have a flag to true at least. >>>>>> >>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> F. >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>
