Hi Francesco, > > 2. Leave single test classes and configure contentType in AbstractTest > with default value JSON. Normally run only JSON tests (like now). Make XML > tests runnable via separate profile / configuration. > > +1
Will redesign it in this way and will try to commit until Monday. Andrei. > -----Original Message----- > From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org] > Sent: Freitag, 25. Januar 2013 18:01 > To: dev@syncope.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Way to parameterize integration tests > > On 25/01/2013 17:39, Andrei Shakirin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > One more topic to discuss: > > Currently integration tests run using communication using JSON > contentType only. > > For new CXF-based tests we are going to run every tests twice: with XML > and JSON [1]. > > > > JUnit proposes elegant solution using parameterized tests: > http://junit.sourceforge.net/javadoc/org/junit/runners/Parameterized.html > . > > Basically it works fine, but unfortunately (as Francesco already noted) > individual tests cannot be executed from Surefire or Failsafe plugins as well > as from some IDEs. > > The ability we've had so far to execute a single IT case is of fundamental > importance to speed up the development process. > > > The problem is that Parameterized runner expect individual test > description in form ClassName#MethodName[Number]. This form cannot be > specified in maven command line, because method name will be not > correctly resolved. > > I do not see any acceptable solution for Parameterized runner now and > propose following alternatives: > > > > 1. Create two classes per each test inherited from common parent for > > all > CXF tests (e.g. AuthenticationTestXMLTestITCase, > AuthenticationTestJsonTestITCase). Always run both variants. > > > > 2. Leave single test classes and configure contentType in AbstractTest > with default value JSON. Normally run only JSON tests (like now). Make XML > tests runnable via separate profile / configuration. > > +1 > I don't like the idea of duplicating test cases, so if we have an easy way to > activate "contentType = XML" it would be acceptable. > > > 3. ... > > Regards. > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-289 > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
