On 30/04/2013 09:59, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
+1 makes sense to me. How long should we continue to support the 1.0.x branch?
Nice question: I was thinking to a sort of "natural end", e.g. fixing
only critical bugs that might be reported (hence nothing ATM for 1.0.9
as reported by JIRA [3]).
Any better idea?
Regards.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi all,
it is already some time since the source trunk is set to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT,
hence anyone is already able to start working on 1.2.0 issues [1],
including the full removal of Spring MVC stuff: who wants to be the first?
;-)
Moreover, our roadmap [2] says 1.2.0 is expected for Q2 2013: I don't
think this is a reachable target, given the amount of issues and the
remaining time (2 months), so I'd propose to shift forward any expected
release date of at least one quarter.
WDYT?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/SYNCOPE/**
fixforversion/12322505#**selectedTab=com.atlassian.**
jira.plugin.system.project%**3Aversion-issues-panel<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE/fixforversion/12322505#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel>
[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/SYNCOPE/**
Roadmap#Roadmap-1.2.0%**28Intermezzo%29<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/Roadmap#Roadmap-1.2.0%28Intermezzo%29>
[3]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.0.9%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20SYNCOPE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
