Hi, I cannot remember any valid reason to keep regexp in object as is.
+1 for Guido proposal.
Rgds,
F.
"Francesco Chicchiriccò" <ilgro...@apache.org> ha scritto:
>On 02/08/2013 10:22, Guido Wimmel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there a specific reason for the particular fixed choice of
>characters allowed in Syncope usernames?
>> ( AccountPolicyEnforcer.PATTERN = Pattern.compile("[a-zA-Z0-9-_@.
>]+"); )
>>
>> We use email addresses as usernames, so we had create our own
>modified copy of AccountPolicyEnforcer to extend the pattern
>> (e.g. allowing the '+' sign).
>
>Hi Guido,
>this seems more than reasonable to me, and I don't remember any valid
>reason to keep that regexp as static there: may Fabio is able to
>provide
>some insight?
>
>> Maybe this could also be made configurable by extending
>AccountPolicySpec? (I could possibly try and provide a patch)
>
>Nice idea: we can always re-discuss this if Fabio or other is able to
>add information.
>
>Side note: since it seems that you are now getting more involved with
>Syncope (and this is definitely good IMHO), I'd encourage you to sign
>and submit an ICLA [1].
>
>Regards.
>
>[1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
>
>--
>Francesco Chicchiriccò
>
>ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
>http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
-- Inviato dal mio cellulare Android con K-9 Mail.
