First one bounced. ---------- Forwarded message ----------
I saw the proposal on user@camel and it sounds great. I see potential fringe benefits for the Camel project as well and volunteer to help out. Cheers, Hadrian On 11/20/2013 11:25 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > Hi all, > in order to be able to freely experiment with this proposal, I've > created an almost empty repository at GitHub > > https://github.com/Tirasa/SyncopeCamel > > where Giacomo will be soon push a simple overlay project, based on > Syncope 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT. > > The idea is to override there some Syncope components (UserController, > RoleController, ...) and introduce the ProvisioningManager - being still > able to successfully run the relevant integration tests. > > Once we've get a working PoC there, we could start discussing whether to > perform a full implementation here, and also the pmost suitable way to > accept Giacomo's contribution. > > WDYT? > Regards. > > On 20/11/2013 15:24, Giacomo Lamonaco wrote: > >> Thanks for your reply! I really appreciate your interest. I'm planning >> to release a POC in the next months, before the end of February, >> because i can work on it only two days for week. >> >> I will keep you updated in the next weeks. >> >> Best Regards. >> >> ----- Messaggio originale ----- >> Da: "Colm O hEigeartaigh" <cohei...@apache.org> >> A: dev@syncope.apache.org >> Inviato: Mercoledì, 20 novembre 2013 14:52:00 >> Oggetto: Re: [Proposal] An Apache Camel Integration Proposal >> >> It looks pretty cool! It's great to see the further integration of >> Syncope with other Apache projects (e.g. CXF). What sort of time frame >> do you envisage for this task + for what version of Syncope - 1.2/1.3? >> Colm. >> >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:25 AM, giacomolm >> <giacomo.lamon...@tirasa.net>wrote: >> >>> I forgot the most important part .. what do you think ? >>> >>> > giacomolm wrote >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> Apache Syncope is a great solution for Identity Management. In >>> this month >>> >> I analyzed some use cases that led me to reflect about the >>> flexibility of >>> >> provisioning process to adapt to various (and sometimes very >>> cumbersome) >>> >> deployment scenarios. >>> >> >>> >> The questions is: How well Syncope orchestrates the provisioning? The >>> >> problem is that Syncope lacks of a provisioning manager: this >>> component >>> >> could allow an easy and fully customizable definition of provisioning >>> >> control logic. >>> >> >>> >> My proposal [1] consists in a redefinition of the (user and role) >>> >> controller concept, through the Apache Camel framework. Why this >>> >> framework? I think that Camel fits the need of easy control logic >>> >> definition. Moreover Camel supports a wide range of external >>> components: >>> >> it means that it can be easily integrated with existing >>> frameworks, like >>> >> Activiti. >>> >> >>> >> [1] http://www.slideshare.net/giacomolm/camel-proposaltirasa >>> >> >
