Il 11/11/2015 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
On 11/11/2015 09:11, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
Hi all,
this discussion is triggered by some request recently received on user@ [1] but also about the ongoing development effort towards 2.0.0.

AFAICT, the current status can be summarized as follows:

1. feature-wise, core is currently in a quite self-consistent state, even tough relevant new feature are ATM set to be implemented in 2.0.0 (mainly SYNCOPE-699 / SYNCOPE-129 / SYNCOPE-534); naturally, there might be bugs, especially considering the great amount of additions compared to 1.2.X

2. console is still under active development to reach usable state (remember we started it from scratch in 2.0.0) - Fabio and Marco are on it

3. enduser is more or less in the same situation of console, possibly a bit more close to the end - Andrea is on it

 4. cli should be almost complete - Massimiliano is on it

5. documentation is less than half-way: getting started needs to be adjusted with latest additions and reference guide is simply yet to be written - I am on it, but seeking for contributions, especially by native speakers - read Colm :-)

Given this overall situation, I would propose to:

 (i) keep pushing on 2, 3, 4 and 5 above
 (ii) fix on (1) on request
(iii) as soon as 2 and 3 are in a presentable state, start thinking of milestone releases (2.0.0-M1, 2.0.0-M2, etc)

Forgot to add:

(iv) move all residual (and cool) features currently scheduled for 2.0.0 to 2.1.0

As far as I can see it, it would be really nice to cut 2.0.0-M1 before the end of year.

WDYT?
Regards.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/ibcz7jx53su73dld


Hi Francesco, this sounds good to me.
+1 to proceed.

Cheers,
F.

--
Fabio Martelli
https://it.linkedin.com/pub/fabio-martelli/1/974/a44

Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/

Apache Syncope PMC
http://people.apache.org/~fmartelli/

Reply via email to