Thanks Francesco for the feedback. Colm.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> wrote: > On 03/03/2016 18:23, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The Syncope cluster page* gives information about deploying multiple >> Syncope instances sharing the same database, and then gives some >> information about Tomcat clustering. >> >> Just wondering what the benefit is, if any, to setting up a Tomcat >> cluster, >> if you don't need session replication? Wouldn't the first scenario suffice >> for load balancing, or am I missing something? >> > > Hum, I believe you are right: as you point out correctly, Syncope core > does not manage any kind of user sessions - while console does; we should > change that wiki page to reflect this difference. > > As for core not managing sessions, changes on such topic are indeed in the > roadmap (SYNCOPE-699 being currently set for 2.1): > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/[DISCUSS]+Apache+Shiro+integration+for+authentication+and+authorization > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/%5BDISCUSS%5D+Apache+Shiro+integration+for+authentication+and+authorization> > > As reported in my comment there, not sure if Shiro is still the best > option, but we'll see when the work for 2.1 is actually going to start - at > the moment all efforts are towards 2.0. > > Regards. > > * >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/Setup+a+Syncope+cluster >> > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: > member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC, CXF committer > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
