FYI, just updated.
Regards.
On 04/03/2016 11:57, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 04/03/2016 11:55, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Thanks Francesco for the feedback.
Would you mind updating that page? Thanks!
Regards.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò
<ilgro...@apache.org> wrote:
On 03/03/2016 18:23, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi all,
The Syncope cluster page* gives information about deploying multiple
Syncope instances sharing the same database, and then gives some
information about Tomcat clustering.
Just wondering what the benefit is, if any, to setting up a Tomcat
cluster,
if you don't need session replication? Wouldn't the first scenario
suffice
for load balancing, or am I missing something?
Hum, I believe you are right: as you point out correctly, Syncope core
does not manage any kind of user sessions - while console does; we
should
change that wiki page to reflect this difference.
As for core not managing sessions, changes on such topic are indeed
in the
roadmap (SYNCOPE-699 being currently set for 2.1):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/[DISCUSS]+Apache+Shiro+integration+for+authentication+and+authorization
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/%5BDISCUSS%5D+Apache+Shiro+integration+for+authentication+and+authorization>
As reported in my comment there, not sure if Shiro is still the best
option, but we'll see when the work for 2.1 is actually going to
start - at
the moment all efforts are towards 2.0.
Regards.
*
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/Setup+a+Syncope+cluster
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC, CXF committer
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
